Obama's Stalker Outwitted In Copenhagen

"That" photo shoot...........

Climate Religion

Geocentric Denier and Heretic: Galileo Relaxing At Home Yesterday

Tom on the blog Left Foot Forwards asks me, in relation to the climate debate, this:

"So, if science isn’t one sided, should we also be teaching and considering alternatives to evolution? Should the government not implement a health policy based on the theory that HIV causes AIDS, since there are scientists (even a Nobel prize winner!) who disagree with that?"

Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed the nigh on hysterical religious belief that some people have attached to climate science?  

The earth is a complex and chaotic system and you'd have to be incredibly stupid to think that mankind has unquestionably "mastered" climate science.  Oh hang on, wait a minute here comes Gordon......  and surprise, surprise he is trying to smear anybody that is critical of the global warming bandwagon as "flat earthers" and "anti-science".

With respect climate, why has everyone forgotten that "established" science is never fact, it is merely the theory which best explains our current observations?

Every week scientists are bringing forward new theories which seem to better explain our observations and often also seeminlgy explain observations better than existing climate models. That is the way science works.

Yet from the ranks of the people who convinced us the Iraq War was based on firm evidence, the knob jockey Ed Miliband tells us "The science is clear and settled and we will push on".  No.  Actually Ed you can fuck off. 

Whilst the government seems intent on spending billions of our money and billions more compensating people in Africa and taxing the crap out of me if I drive, fly or put my litter in the wrong coloured bin, then I'm definitely interested in listening to what sceptical scientists have to say.

• If the politicians are basing all their endevaours on a couple of data sets which are fatally flawed I want to know.

• If indeed there is global warming, then I'm curious when scientists say that the politicians efforts will have negligble impact compared to natural phenomena.

• If there is runaway global warming, then what the fuck are politicians playing at and why aren't they investing their billions into Geo-Engineering projects to save us all, rather than giving some war lord in Sierra Leone funding to buy more gold plated AK47's?

The politicians haven't even answered the most basic scientific questions.  But - then they never intended to did they?  Global warming is good for votes. (Ask David Cameron)  It is a fantastic opportunity to strut around the world stage saying nice fluffy things and having your mooning mug plastered over telly 24 x 7.  

Given the billions Gordon has shat down the toilet protecting his own ego, a few billion more spent on the green bandwagon and added to his vanity debt are not going to bother him in the slightest.

And now - back to Roger from Left Foot Forwards.............. if schools can recognise that the universe is sufficiently chaotic and misunderstood system and teach accordingly, then they can recognise that climate science is the same.  In which case they should be educating kids, not teaching them "facts", but educating them in the principles of the scientific method and the value of enquiring minds.

Yet unfortunately we all know that schools have been turned into brainwashed breeding grounds where kids are taught Labour's views on climate change from an early age.

Brace Yourself For A Tidal Wave Of Copenhagen Bullshit

Copenhagen has collapsed on it's arse.  Which means all that is left is for the leaders to cobble together a moth ridden scabby "deal" which they can announce as a historic success. 

Aides to each national leader will then brief the press and hint that their man or woman was responsible for banging heads together and securing agreement.

We will all then have to sit through days and days where Gordon Brown and his Ministers desperately pick over the same stock  words in a seeming contest to construct the most schmaltzy sentence.   Thus to make things more interesting I’ve constructed a simple bullshit-bingo style card game scored as follows (Aces high)

Ace                      Christmas

King                     Peace

Queen                  The people have spoken

Jack                     The world has come together

10                         Future Generations

9                           Hope

8                           Freedom From Extreme Weather

7                           Global Grand Bargain

6                           Bangladesh

5                           Children

4                           Developing Countries

3                           Historic

2                           Deal

1                           Future

Personally my money is on Ed Balls to hit the full Christmas Payload with a mind numbing statement like this:

“This is a historic deal for all of us, for freedom from extreme weather and for all our children.  This global grand bargain gives future generations a chance, the little girl in Bangladesh or the boy in Brazil can sleep safely knowing that Western Countries are working in a partnership of fairness with developing countries. The people have spoken.  This Christmas the world has come together for hope, peace and the future.”

Did He Really Just Say That?!

This morning on BBC1 at 7.26am......... The Great Helmsman was on live TV and said this:

What is wrong  with extreme weather?  Is the Antarctic bad?  Is the Sahara awful?  Should Hurricanes be outlawed?  Will the weather be banned and will we all be living in a climate chosen by Gordon?

Gordon can barely disguise his desire to tax and control people on a global scale in his battle to subdue the weather so that it conforms to his 5 year targets.

There can no longer be any doubt - the Green Movement has been high-jacked by Socialists.  I'm with Lord Monckton and his "traffic light analogy" on this one:

They are GREEN because they are too YELLOW to admit that they are really RED.

How Many People Are Required To Pay Off Our Debt Interest Next Year?

I urge everyone to read Anna Raccoon's excellent article this morning.  Ever felt numbed by all the talk of millions, billions and trillions?  The numbers start to feel meaningless after a while - because they are not relative to anything that seems real.

The current financial crisis has made this worse. Trillions of debt and risk are talked about daily.  If you wonder why the public are not up in arms at the size of the debt that our current government has ramped up - then this is the reason.  The public are numb to the numbers.

Anna suggests using a new unit a measurement "A Drone" - where 1 Drone is equivalent to £1,816.19  (or the amount the government is able to tax one person who earns the equivalent of the minimum wage annually).

The country will be paying £44.4Bn in debt interest alone next year.  Which means that nearly 2.5 million (2,444,678) hard working people are held within the government's harness just to pay for Gordon's failure to keep our debt under control.

That number is far more understandable.  Angry about the state of the nations finances yet?

Wikileaks - Gordon Brown's Hairdo Blunder

A post on Wikileaks reveals the real story behind the most recent photo of Gordon looking like an imbecile.

Apparently this is what happened...........

"Gordon bunked down in a basic hut on his overnight stay in Afghanistan.  With no telephone available, Gordon was unable to make his usual phone calls to Susan Boyle or X-Factor contestants and neither was he able to make any early morning surprise phone calls to members of the public who'd called him a prat.  

With time on his hand hands, he decided he needed to do something to reach out to more voters and for reasons best known to himself changed his hairstyle to an afro hairdo using the curlers and a Just For Men kit he'd borrowed from his make-up lady.

Aides went absolutely bonkers the first time Gordon walked out of the hut in the morning, although a quick thinking soldier managed to get a snap on his iPhone. 

Desperate to salvage the situation, the only way that the afro could be "fully contained" was with an RAF Mark 15 Helicopter Aircrew Flying Helmet."

Following exposure of the story Number 10 have been forced to confirm that the helmet was a spare and that no service personnel were deprived of safety equipment that had been used to cover Gordon's hair.

Update: Sources close to the Prime Minister have denied that today's webchat with the Prime Minister was originally planned to include web-cam footage.

The picture of Gordon in the hair covering helmet here.

Using Dead Troops For Self Publicity Purposes

As I type this Gordon Brown is taking soft questions from the public in a webchat on the topic of on Afghanistan.

Will the Prime Mentalist answer my question I wonder?

To save you squinting - I asked: "Was your recent visit to Afghanistan just a PR stunt ahead of a snap election early in the new year?"

Update: Was Gordon able to answer my question?  No.  Happily, however, he did  find time to answer the 2 questions which said something charitable towards him:

Conclusion:  Malcolm Tucker will consider this a success.  Gordon didn't cock-up and make any biscuit type gaffes, plus if the press bother to report this, then unbelievably they have managed to find a couple of kind words about Gordon from members of the public.  A PR success.